VICE PRESIDENT SAID NO TO CENSURE RESOLUTION - Way2News TV - Breaking News, Latest News, Politics News, Business News

Hot

VICE PRESIDENT SAID NO TO CENSURE RESOLUTION

New Delhi, April 23, (way2newstv.com):
Vice-President Venkaiah Naidu on Monday dismissed the censure notice of the Opposition parties, seeking removal of Supreme Court Chief Justice Deepak Mishra.However, the Supreme Court Chief Justice and other judges had a long standing meeting after the censure notice rejected by the Venkaiah naidu. Just before the morning commencement hearings, the judges will meet and finish it within five minutes.But today it lasted for 20 minutes. All the jurisdictions started 15 minutes late. After rejecting the notice of the accused, Vermaiah Naidu said, "The five allegations mentioned in the notice of the accusation and the documents related to it. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has said that they are not appropriate and reasonable reasons for misconduct. It has come to a firm conclusion that judges and constitutional experts have consulted and can not allow this notice. After a three-day long consultation, a key decision was taken. Venkaiah, former Attorney General KK Venugopal, Justice K. Parasharan, former Secretary General of the Lok Sabha Subhash Kashyap and former Secretary Peke Malhotra. 


VICE PRESIDENT SAID NO TO CENSURE RESOLUTION

Seven Opposition parties including Congress and 64 Rajya Sabha members signed a notice to the Vice President and Rajya Sabha chairman Venkaiah Naidu on Friday to appeal the Supreme Court Chief Justice. In the five cases, Chief Justice Deepak Mishra has been accused of misconduct. The five charges mentioned in the notice are: In the case of Prasad Education Trust case in Odisha, the accused have been accused of not accepting an inquiry into the former High Court judge. The Prasad Education Trust case is supposed to be a constitutional authority, on the other hand, to exercise legal powers. Justice Chelameswar, the bench headed by Justice Ramesh Kumar, In his notice, he had filed a wrong affidavit regarding his land. Only certain specific benches have been entrusted with the responsibility to influence the results in sensitive cases.